Stay Connected
Search
Login
« Some Ideas for Reducing Our Pill Dependency | Main | The MDA-FDA Raw Milk Magical Mystery Tour Moves East »
Wednesday
Jan032007

Food and Other Systems Out of Control

In business schools, students are taught that “the system is the solution.” I was reminded of that refrain while reading Dave Milano’s incisive comments (accompanying my “Musings of a Raw Milk Outlaw” posting a couple days ago) about the problem being the system rather than the factory food.

It’s the combination of rapid expansion and centralization that creates problems, he argues, and there’s lots of compelling evidence to back him up. I would add that there’s another component that creates problems: the need to squeeze ever-increasing profits out of these systems.

Thus, our national park system, and even our national highway system, are decent systems, in part because they are publicly-run and based on serving people, rather than shareholders. The stability of our public systems, including the highway system, isn’t guaranteed, though. An article in the current Mother Jones describes a move afoot to place the nation’s toll roads under private management. It’s already happened with the Indiana Toll Road, and more are in the works, with some investors fantasizing about placing the entire highway system under the rule of investment banks and foreign corporations that know how to collect tolls.

I found this article very disturbing in part because, when a system shifts from public to private management, the goals change, as in prices go up and maintenance gets cut back, so as to maximize profits. Also, it just reinforces the trend toward privatization and systematization.

The food industry depends heavily on processing to justify the system. And the profits associated with processing increase based on increasing volume and decreasing costs of raw materials. Thus, the dairy industry depends on a few companies dominating the processing, or pasteurization, with declining prices paid to farmers. One of the reasons raw milk is such a threat to this system is that, without pasteurization, the entire system is called into question, because then, who needs the processors?

Same with the nutritional supplement/pharma system, as several readers pointed out in my posting about Life Extension a few days ago. The system’s goal is to push as many pills as possible, even if the pill pushing is at the expense of raw foods that might do the job better than the pills.

Viewed through this prism, the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) even calls itself a “system,” and the idea once again is to centralize and commoditize, for the benefit of a few major processors. As for the lofty goals Milano concludes with, I couldn’t have said it any better.

Reader Comments (5)

Have you seen the documentary "The Corporation"? It poses that corporations grew out of control when they were given the same legal status as citizens by the courts (I can't remember the date). I am halfway through the movie right now and am finding it very interesting. I think it has relevance to this issue of systems.
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterElizabeth McInerney
Well now, I feel like I have a friend out there in the great big world!

Now, Mr. Gumpert, put your obviously sharp mind to this, if you will: The highway system, decent as you say, is first and foremost a servant of our big systems. Without it we Pennsylvanians would not be able to purchase, for example, all that wonderfully safe pastuerized, homogenized, Wisconsin (or California) milk. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against good roads (or I don't know, maybe I am) but I do believe that the state and federal highway systems have grown way to big for their bridges (sorry, couldn't resist).

My home is in dairy country--I should say former dairy country. We were once a place of thriving family farms, centerpieced by the daiy cow, but no more. Though a few farmers hang on here--their spindly financial legs propped up only by debt, personal initiative, twenty-year-old milk prices, and low living standards--most of this region has devolved into formerfarmland. Properties not yet taken over by well-paid members of the service economy are simply reverting back to nature, like compost. These days our Sunday (dirt-road) drives are full of tumble-down barns, poorly maintained farmhouses, double-wides, and logged-off hillsides. Crazily, our local grocery stores are full of immigrant milk.

I suppose I'm beginning to sound crotchety, but I so long for the sweet, old-fashioned relationships fostered by a thriving local economy.

And oh yes, in honesty I must also mention that, like you, I do enjoy and (mostly) admire our park systems.
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDave Milano
Altho some of my best friends are MBA's, I've long held a guarded opinion about the usefulness of their training. It seems like it doesn't take a genius to figure out ways to consolidate and systemize things so as to get efficiencies of scale, particularly when a new technology intervenes (like the Internet) which offers so many new possibilities. What is a bigger challenge, it seems, is to take the best opportunities for efficiency which are offered and temper them with humanity and wisdom so that the human beings who are affected, or who have to work within such systems, can still relate to the system in a meaningful, fair, human and yes, even a moral way. Ultimately, an adaptation tempered with humanity will be even more efficient than the adaptation that looks best simply "on the numbers." A case in point is Wal-Mart's plan to schedule its personnel by computer, which will surely lead to human misery in its workforce (just as such scheduling led to chaos when it was used to manage rotations in and out of Vietnam 40 years ago). On the other hand, Wal-Mart's actions in the Gulf Coast and in fostering more efficient lighting are inspired in the best way. Unfortunately, a truly humane result from conventional reductionist thinking is all too unusual.
January 6, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Bemis
This is an interesting story about the "system"

What bugs me most about this story is that if the large dairies would have told the guy that he would have to pay them if he wanted to stay in business they would have been charged with extortion but since they had the gov't do it it's all nice and legal.

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/04/12/government-drives-milk-prices-up-again/

January 7, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMac
Mac, you are absolutely correct. Economic pressures brought by monopolies, or near-monopolies in federal commerce, can get remedies under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which has long teeth. If any farmers have been told by one of the biggies, for example, we won't buy your milk unless you stop selling into these cow-share arrangements, then that could be a criminal situation and it would be nice to know about those kinds of facts.
January 7, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Bemis
Member Account Required
Register or Log In to leave comments. Click the links here or in the upper right part of the page.