Stay Connected
Search
Login
« It Sure Would Be Nice to Have Public Discussions About Raw Milk, But You Do Need Someone to Discuss With | Main | Toxic Loans and Toxic Food—The Regulators Sure Have a Funny Way of Making Us Feel Warm and Cuddly »
Wednesday
Oct012008

CDFA Gets Its Way As Governor Vetoes SB201—Look for Wardens to Come Down Hard on the Inmates

Mark McAfee knew the political vibes had turned bad four or five days ago. That’s when inspectors from the California Department of Food and Agriculture began coming down hard on his Organic Pastures Dairy Co.

“They said a window in a bathroom of our mobile milk barn wasn’t big enough. So they wanted an electrical exhaust fan. They wanted us to insulate the rafters. It has nothing to do with the milking.” In addition, “They said there were spider webs in our eves. We had done a complete cleaning two weeks before.”

The Fresno County Health Department joined in as well. “They want us to submit new plans for the authorization of our mobile milk barn,” says Mark. It was officiallly authorized eight years ago.

“This is a concerted effort.” A little like what happens in a prison after the inmates rebel: the warden takes his revenge.

The regulators likely knew what was going to happen a few days before yesterday, when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger put his veto to SB 201, the legislation that passed both houses of the California legislature nearly unanimously. After all, the governor’s statement accompanying the veto was likely written by the CDFA when it argued that life under AB 1735 is just wonderful for the state’s two raw milk dairies:

“Looking past the lobbying techniques, public relations campaign, and legal maneuvering in the courts, one conclusion is inescapably clear: the standard in place has kept harmful products off the shelves and California’s raw milk dairies have been operating successfully under it for the entirety of 2008.”

Yes, the ten-coliform-per-milliliter standard has been operating so successfully that both Organic Pastures and Claravale Farm have been essentially balancing on the edge of a proverbial cliff to avoid being shut down. Each must pass a series of three of five tests on each of its dairy products. Failure to pass three of five means they are “downgraded," or prohibited from selling—until they pass. Each has been “downgraded” or nearly downgraded on various products since the new coliform standard took effect last January, only to pass a new test that allowed them to resume shipping within a few days.

But those tests were administered when the CDFA was presumably pulling its punches—trying to avoid highly public shutdowns. Now that SB 201 has been trashed, well, it is presumably free to assert its authority, with no oversight. One of these days, one or both dairies won't pass, and the milk will cease flowing. The sponsor of SB 201. Sen. Dean Florez, nearly said as much today, arguing that the veto "can be taken as an attempt to regulate California’s two raw milk dairies out of business."

At the rally attended by actor Martin Sheen in early September, one of Claravale’s owners, Collette Cassidy, told attendees that failure to pass SB 201 could put her dairy, which accounts for 10-20% of California's raw milk, out of business.

Mark McAfee says he is "saddened, but not surprised." The sad part, he said, is that "CDFA knew they could by-pass the entire (legislative) process...and just pull the strings at the last minute to get it vetoed"--for example, ignore the requests of Sen. Dean Florez to testify at hearings last spring on SB 201. That despite thousands of emails and calls to the governor's office in support of SB 201, and the efforts of some of his celebrity friends, like Charlie Sheen and long-time health enthusiast Jack Lalanne.

Raw milk supporters now have two options to pursue. One is a re-vote on SB 201. If it passed by the same lopsided majorities as before, the veto could be overturned. But on re-votes, Republicans often support the governor, so the dynamics could change. And Sen. Florez in his statement today referred only to "putting forther legislation next year to move the ball forward on this important issue." 

Also, the suit filed last spring by the Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund is still pending, and will likely be pushed to the forefront. That suit, by OPDC and Claravale, had led to a state judge imposing a temporary restraining order on enforcement of the ten-coliform standard last spring, but the order was eventually lifted by the state judge.

The immediate question seems to be this: can California's raw milk suppliers survive the wrath of the wardens?

Reader Comments (25)

I think you mean Martin Sheen, not Charlie.
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMissy
This is great news. Thanks for the update David.!!!

Maybe Martin Sheen was not the way to go on this one.! :)
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDaily Reader
Welcome to the United Corporate States of Amerika that will now dictate what you and I eat and drink. Monday the bailout or call it the sellout bill died, today the Senate breathed new life into this first step in the final confiscation of what wealth we all have left. The American dream is fast becoming the American nightmare and its being done by us.
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDon
This is terrible news!
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterconcerned
It's not over just yet. If the senate votes for the bill the way they did last time, then it will override the veto. But it's important that we keep contacting and calling our representatives.
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterrevgen
Is it only the senate that has to override the veto or both houses?
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterconcerned
revgen,

You are absolutely right, It is important for all to contact their representatives not matter what side of the fence you are on with this. Ive been working on that myself.

Thanks,
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDaily Reader
SB 201 ( with a new number and name ) will be revived in January 2009 with renewed life and vigor.

Until then, we survive and battle. The warden is being very harsh right now, we will "turn the other cheak in compliance" and let Gary Cox give them a piece of their own hate in December when Assembly woman Nicole Para ( D ) and Assemblyman Tom Berryhill ( R ) testify and defend their words spoken on the record in the State Assembly Hearings. Nicole stated that "if AB 1735 stands it would be over my dead body" and Tom Berryhil said that CDFA "heads should roll" for decieving the legislature. There will be a day when all is attoned.

Looks like sales will go up again. When ever we are crucified consumers love us even more. Raw milk is a truth that will take more than this to kill.

There will be no revote to overturn the CDFA motivated veto. The members of legislature would need to return for the extra special vote and they are now adjurned for this session.

It appears that Arnold did sign other legislation to correct other flaws in AB1735 ( Galgiani ). But his SB 201 veto statement written by his handlers at CDFA mocked the hearings and raw milk moms testimonies and efforts as " acts of loobying and public relations". Truly hateful words drafted by horrible people at CDFA. How could anyone look a raw milk mom in the eye and say that what they believe is a farce or worse. Please read the whole veto statement. It stinks of CDFA and FDA corruption. Arnold never heard a single thing we said.

I am going to take a chapter from the Amish and forgive Dr. Stephen Beam CDFA and John Sheehan of the FDA for their acts of treachery. They do not know what they have done and or who they have hurt by their cowardly secret corrupt acts.

For now we will turn the other cheak and keep our chins up....
....I promise that raw milk will flow...what ever it takes.

Senator Dean Florez has promised a new bill in 2009 and it will be a great one....we have learned much from this tragic political episode. We will carry these lessons forward.

Mark McAfee
OPDC
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered Commentermark mcafee
Mark,

You may need to turn the other cheek, I and others don't have to. After reading David's post, I sent letters to many here in Sacto. Phone calls will be coming. Indeed a sad day. Dictatorship over the American public. What will they outlaw next?

Steroids can affect the brain. But then, he who gives the most may win....
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSylvia
Victory is ours....

....CDFA PhDs are more interested in their own salaries, FDA pats on the back, career enhancement, awaiting their own pathetic retirements and making their Winnebago payments. Show me one CDFA PhD that is loved by a consumer....they do not exist.

We are interested in human health, freedom and greater things. Our goals will far outlive theirs.

Ours are eternal and true....no veto will deny us this.

Mark McAfee
October 1, 2008 | Unregistered Commentermark mcafee
Unfortunately, the bureaucracy has become so big, so entrenched, and so influenced by folks with "access"--read dollars and power--that our legisltors in many ways are puppets. As long as the legislators continue to grow bureacracy, to vote more power and money to governmemt and fail to administer in a responsible manner, this is what goes on. Share operations are growing here in Virginia---Yeah! But the down side is that one operation, a large one, has already ahd her "share contract" "approved" by the state---a move that it sure to bring about heavy handedness. I am just waiting for the other shoe to drop. Our friend Bill Chirdon will be hanging out w/ VDACS' John Beers, teh dairy nazi in Virginia, for a dairying conference next week. FTCLDF will be represented by Pete Kennedy, but with the amount of naivity I see from new share operators, it is only a matter of time before the foot goes down on the neck.
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKathryn Russell
Kathryn - it's a bit worse in the CA case, since the legislature worked the way it should, and the executive was in the pocket of the special interests, represented by the bureaucracy. The bureaucracy is a creation of the executive branch, so this should not be surprising. This trend has been happening also in Washington the last 7 years, and even above the economic issues, the mega-issue in this bailout was another big grab of power by the executive, just as happened post-9/11. This time, the congress is finally standing up on its hind two legs and saying "Whoa!" Perhaps the same revolt from below will happen in CA as a result of this exercise of power. I understand there is a movement to recall the Gov. He may yet regret listening to the entrenched interests rather than to democratic process. I believe, there is power in the rightness of a cause widely believed and supported from the grass roots; we just have to keep at it.
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Bemis
Sorry, Steve, but I will have to disagree with your on the responsibility of the Executive Branch in general for the mess. The legislators are culpable for the abidication of many of their responsibilities by passing laws ENABLING executive bureaucratic growth, for creating new "goals", "commissions", programs, etc. which of course, must be administered, and ta-da---thge legislature is in charge of FUNDING those operations. IMO it is often a game of good cop/bad cop between the legislators and the executive branch. And as far as the legislature in CA working "as it should", consider the fact that they have not responding in many other cases, home schooling, for example, to act when they should have, and the milk bill that was hammered out was far from perfect.

The trend you describe started back in full force with Woodrow Wilson, far before the last 7 years, and I will be shocked and amazed if Congress actually grows some and does not do a bailout here of some ilk. After all "the people" have been pitching a fit, but the Chambers of Commerce, and the financial institutions who have been flagrently gambling are pushing hard. The AARP is leaning on them, hard, but quietly, because of the devaluing of assets that will come as a result of economic correction. Bail out will come. How it will finalize I have no idea. My contacts w/ my legislators will hopefully. maybe, cause them to not be as irresponsible as they tend to. The checks and balances of teh branches of government don't work so well when any of the branches abdicates their responsibility, which has what has been happening for some time.
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKathryn Russell
Your cynicism about the "dance" back and forth between the Executive and Legislative branches had occured to me as well. Some legislators, however, I think truly do get teed off at some point (thanks to pressures brought to bear from below) - and in this regard, term limits are probably a good thing since fresh faces in the legislature are perhaps not as jaundiced and sold out (altho, term limits also allow the lobbyists to become the permanent legislature in many ways) - the real question will be, both nationally and locally, how teed off they get, and whether anything really changes as a result. It is surely not a happy situation for our "democracy."
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Bemis
The only good thing concerning all the nefarious events we have suffered at the hands of our PUBLIC SERVANTS over the last 2 years and now the current economic 911 is that their mask has come off. A Senator said on CNBC that he would vote for the bailout bill to demostrate his leadership and reject the will of the people.
Wall Street makes bets on worthless flawed investments and looses, no problem Main Street the tax payer FORCED to the rescue $700 billion plus. But the bailout could make money for the tax payer if that is true why would Wall Street give up the worth less paper? Main Street isnt buying cars so the auto industry is in trouble no problem TPTB forces Main Street to pony up $25 billion for the auto industry without producing even one car. Buffet just bought billions of dollars worth of GE and GS stock reaping a minium 10% plus return. These are what you call SWEET deals. As for MAIN STREET the tax payer? The key word is payer we pay and pay and pay but soon the piggy bank will be empty. If this mind numbing greed, lies and unimaginable theft doesnt wake up our fellow Americans perhaps empty wallets will. Save Wall Street to save Main Street, Sounds a bit like destroy raw dairy to save the little children and the eldery does it not?
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDon
There are a few good and hoenst legislators. However, in the scheme of things, regardless of party affiliations thsoe Ron Pauls and Dennis Kuciniches seem to have a difficult time accomplishing a great deal. Finger in teh dike kind of thing.

I think a much more effective manner, rather than term limits, would be to start off by marketing the highly expensive buildings they work and play in, and having them adjorn in old elementary schools or the Days in conferenece rooms. Remove the glamous. That is a start. And ask some of the hionest respresentative what THEY think is a good path back to where we need to be. We are not supposed to be a democracy, were are supposed to be a constitutional republic. As far as at a federal level, i think that things started to go downhill when the vice president was the loser...
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKathryn Russell
I absolutely slays me when these multimillion dollar salasires given for failed performance are not screamed about in congress, while they are busy creating a system for SOCIALIZATION of risks and PRIVATIZATION of profits,,,say fascism anyone? Whenwill folks wake up and smell the roses? Fighhts all over the contry for access to good food, farmers working from dawn to dusk, with oftne only their land as retirement assets, and congress listening to whiners about their 401k's.
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKathryn Russell
Seems a concerted effort to inculcate the population 'for our safety' is on the march. With SB 201 defeat, Marler's 10-odd websites about pathogens (sheesh - truly predatory), and FDA's non-stop avoidance of science...We need to organize and do our own education campaign.
-Blair
Industry News - PM
FSIS targets kids with ‘food safety camp’

By Ann Bagel Storck on 10/2/2008

Arrowsight, Inc.
Attending summer camp has long been a tradition for many kids, but USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service put a new spin on that time-honored practice.

This week nearly 60 students participated in hands-on demonstrations to learn food safety lessons through science at a "food safety camp" hosted by FSIS for fourth-graders from Prince Georges County, Md.

Each student had the opportunity to view common types of foodborne bacteria through high-powered microscopes, participate in hand-washing experiments using glow-in-the-dark materials, prepare safe snacks in the microwave and calibrate different types of food thermometers. Throughout the day, students met with USDA scientists to learn about how bacteria in food may cause illness and how to avoid it.

"It is important that children be taught about food safety so they can understand what behaviors to embrace and which ones to avoid," said Acting Under Secretary for Food Safety Beth Johnson. "We teach safety when kids learn to swim and ride bikes, and we need to teach safety when it comes to handling and preparing food."
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMary Blair McMorran
Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer on Wednesday announced $13.8 million awarded to support research, education and outreach for food safety.

USDA awarded the grants in 19 states through the National Integrated Food Safety Initiative (NIFSI). For a full list of institutions receiving the grants, click here.
Here's another bunch of taxpayer money for 'food safely'...
They are running scared!

Industry News - AM
USDA awards more than $13 million in food safety grants

By Ann Bagel Storck on 10/2/2008
Each year, USDA's Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service allocates NIFSI grant funds so that sound, practical, science-based knowledge can be shared among teachers, scientists, health professionals, researchers, farmers, food processors, foodservice workers and all who impact the safety of the U.S. food supply.

NIFSI grant funds often are used to develop education and outreach programs for consumers.
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMary Blair McMorran
MSU was awarded a $50,000 grant by the USDA ( NIFSI ) to study raw milk and its risks and safety.

This could be very good or bad....I hope the grant does not come with an agenda other than pure science!! The more good information that can be confirmed and provided to government the better.

I am attending the conference... if they will have me. This could truly break new ground with the FDA and other hard headed government types.

Mark McAfee
October 2, 2008 | Unregistered Commentermark mcafee
Member Account Required
Register or Log In to leave comments. Click the links here or in the upper right part of the page.