Theres a powerful need by those opposed to consumers having
free access to raw milk to say, I told you so. Each time there is a report of
illness potentially associated with raw milk, these people go ballistic. Its
the old gotcha routine.

The latest example comes from a situation in Connecticut in
which four children who consumed raw milk from the states only organic dairy
became ill over the last week. (A few comments following my previous post refer to it.) I have been blogging about raw milk for awhile
I am busier than ever, chortles germ lawyer Bill Marler on his blog, reporting on the
Connecticut situation.

Because these cases often are pretty well divorced from
reality by the time people like Marler get hold of them, I called the farm,
Simsbury Town Farm Dairy. It turns out its not a conventional farm, but is
instead owned by the small town of Simsbury and operated by a nonprofit
organization known as The Friends of Town Farm Dairy.

Bill Dryden, president of the organization, told me that the
town has owned the farm since 1883, when it was deeded to the town for the
benefit of the poor. People who couldnt make ends meet could come to the farm
and earn their food and shelter at the farm by working there.

That approach ended in the late 1940s as the move to cities
and the demise of farming gained speed. Too badit might help a lot of people
being put out into the streets by the subprime mortgage mess. Since then, the
farms been leased by various farmers.

As far as raw milk is concerned, the dairy was formed 22
years ago, according to Dryden, and consumers would come to the farm with
containers and make purchases. But a year ago, The Friends decided to begin
bottling milkboth pasteurized and unpasteurizedfor sale via retail outlets,
since retailing of raw milk is legal in Connecticut.

I should note at this point that Dryden didnt know anything
about the controversies swirling around raw milk in California, Pennsylvania,
New York, and other states. His day job is that hes a management consultant,
and he sees his involvement with The Friends as part of an effort to help the
farm serve as a local resource for education and conservation. 

Dryden confirmed that the dairy has, at the states request,
discontinued sales of raw milk. But he said this isnt an open-and-shut case.
Since the state notified The Friends of the illnesses a week ago, no E.coli
0157:H7 has been found in the milk or on the farm. The initial test (of milk)
came back negative. Theres no link except the circumstance of the children becoming
ill.

He says the dairy has received a few calls in the past when
children have become ill, and the illnesses turned out to be from other causes.
One turned out to be the day care centerThe knee-jerk reaction is that this
must be raw milk.

Now, on the other side, todays Hartford Courant has what
seems a reasonably reported article in which it says the farmers who had been
running the dairy departed as of July 1, and that since then, the dairy has
been run by volunteers. An official of the dairy is quoted as saying there
might have been some let-down in procedures that could have led to
contamination of milk.

If that turns out to be the case, then it seems The Friends
have a challenge to fix the problem and make sure it doesnt happen again. Beyond that, it seems clear is that this particular milk production
model isnt your typical model, and that there is a desire by those involved to
make sure any problems are resolved.

Theres still a good ways to go before the Simsbury Town
Farm Dairy is convicted, though.

In the meantime, Im still not sure where this need to
demonize raw milk continues to come from. Perhaps from the fragility of the opponennts
case? From their need for control? From their desire to profit? From their
ideology that factory farming is inherently cleaner farming? Ego?

As someone who favors consumers having the freedom to access
raw milk, I want the product to be as safe as possible. I dont suggest that
people dont get sick from raw milk on occasion, any more than I suggest they
dont get sick from ribs and sushi and jalapeno peppers and hamburger and
salami. The Hartford Courant article reports that in Connecticut between 2001
and 2007, there were 282 E.coli cases reported in the state, of which three possibly
involved raw milk, since three of those people reported consuming raw milk
before they got sick That means that at least 279 E.coli cases came from
other foods. 

I don’t oppose methodologies that will improve safety, a la SB 201 in California, and many other raw milk advocates feel the same way. There’s just something terribly misguided about the knee-jerk reaction to any report of possible illness from raw milk that it is a significant public health hazard.