Mark McAfee of Organic Pastures Dairy Co. has been pretty upfront about what he thinks of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Earlier today, during a 45-minute hearing in front of a federal magistrate in Fresno, CA, Mark got a sense of what the FDA thinks of him. No big surprise, but the agency doesn’t seem to care much for him, either. But in expressing its dislike, the FDA also provided a taste of what a system of federal regulation of interstate shipment of raw milk distribution could be like. Think Big Brother, big time.

The hearing was held to finalize a plea agreement growing out of a federal indictment last year of OPDC and Mark for selling raw milk, labeled as pet food, to out-of-state customers. As part of the agreement, OPDC pleaded guilty to shipping two half gallons of raw milk to FDA investigators, while Mark pleaded innocent. OPDC agreed to discontinue selling raw dairy products outside California for the next two years.

If OPDC violates the agreement? The FDA requested and the judge agreed that Mark could be jailed for up to a year and fined up to $250,000.

However, the FDA did agree to allow OPDC to continue shipping raw milk to certain animal facilities, like zoos. But the agency’s proposed terms are so restrictive as to be nearly laughable. OPDC’s lawyer, Gary Cox of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, will seek to get them changed. But in the meantime, the FDA’s terms, according to documents provided by OPDC, allow for the following:

–OPDC can “only ship raw milk and raw milk products to end use animal facilities,” including zoos, research labs, and veterinary practices;

–“The veterinary health professional or animal caretaker must have a legitimate provider/client-patient relationship with the animal to which the product is to be fed.”

–Prior to shipping any milk, OPDC must provide to the FDA’s San Francisco office assorted information about the recipient, including the “identity of each animal to which the raw milk or milk products will be fed and a declaration that the consignee has a legitimate provider/client-patient relationship with the animal to which the product is to be fed.”

–Milk recipients must “keep records of all use and disposition of raw milk and raw milk products received from OPDC.”

–Recipients must “destroy or return to OPDC any unused product…(and) provide OPDC with documented accounting of all quantities destroyed within 15 days of destruction…”

And penalties for violating any of these rules are attention-grabbing: up to five years imprisonment, or a fine up to $250,000, or both.

For now, Mark is halting all sales to out-of-state animal facilities. “It could take weeks for every order to just be approved,” he says, never mind all the other technicalities. He points out that some of the animal facilities are in areas where raw milk is difficult to obtain, and they depend on his shipments to feed to young animals.

But it’s hard to imagine a zoo manager purchasing milk under such circumstances—having to keep records of all milk fed to animals, and risking a fine or imprisonment for a screwup.

Is this a possible taste of what federal regulation of interstate shipments of raw milk could be like in the future? Raw milk would be something like a controlled drug. 

***

There’s a pretty amazing article on the editorial page of today’s Wall Street Journal by some of the biggest names in alternative health, including Deepak Chopra and Andrew Weil. They argue that by changing their lifestyles–via diet, yoga, meditation, and acupuncture–Americans could reduce or reverse the impact of chronic disease, and the country could save huge expenditures on healthcare. The argument isn’t especially new, but the fact that it is appearing on the editorial page of the WSJ, a bastion of agribusiness and Big Pharma, is nearly earthshaking.